The highlight of FreeBSD is its excellent performance in applications for Web servers and database data. It is recommended to use it if you want being a new user of systems BSDs, mainly by the range of applications that this system offers. The the OpenBSD system has been designed to be extretamente efficient in terms of security. This philosophy is visible already in the installation process, where it disables some features that can be used for purposes dangerous. In the process of development, the code is evaluated and re-evaluated constantly.
When an error is detected, an immediate solution is has been developed and applied. The user needs a certain experience, precisely because of the issue of security. You need to know this area to know how to configure the system. The compatibility of the OpenBSD architectures is a highlight. A very important feature of OpenBSD is that the from him was created the project OpenSSH how could it not leave be, a project that emphasizes safety and security.
Its use has constant growth. It is necessary to a certain experience, mainly with safety issues. This system is very used on computers that serve as the router, firewall, backup and monitoring. Released in , the NetBSD is a system that stands out for being compatible with a huge amount of platforms.
Believe me, it already was implemented even in the video game console Dreamcast, Sega. It is certainly the most comprehensive system that exists in the question architecture. For this reason, there are many users this system they chose to use it to have that play their computers the old in the trash the old Apple computers, for example. The issue of security is also strong in the NetBSD.
But the focus is to even enable the system to be multi-platform. Many computing students prefer to use the NetBSD to search for its ability to be compatible with various platforms. As the famous platform Friend also is compatible. Most of what they host on GitHub is a mirror though. I think the logo is so appropriate-- it's a cat I like cats, but they try to be cute about everything and they treat humans like servants in a disguise, with tentacles.
That's some very strong and true-to-life branding indeed. Jay Great one! Greemngreek Bariya! Dussehra Mubarak bhi. JuvenalUrbino Thank you for your elaborated answer.
Off to edit my rc. JuvenalUrbino I agree with you about documentation, but this reflects the size of the project as you say. Also, very often you can get cross-information from FreeBSD. Those two don't like each other but we go there. But, having agreed with you there, I disagree with the rest. Friendly of course. I don't want NetBSD to get jails, zfs, sandboxing etc. That's already done by FreeBSD and really it would be a waste of resources to even attempt them.
Rock solid. Thanks for pointing that out, my mind had completely ignored it, even when pin quoted me. OpenBSD seems too dependant on one person and locked down. There are other BSDs too but I don't know much about them. As others have stated, it's a smaller ecosystem, so it does suffer from lack of support for users.
I would like to see them put up a better Wiki. If you subscribe to their mailing lists as I do to some , they are quiet for months on end.
Contrast this to FreeBSD where it's daily or hourly multiple messages and discussions. I really like NetBSD's minimalist approach by design or by lack of funding, it matters not. I'd call that great. I've seen many worse on other OSs. Now this goes off-topic Which I did provide even though I didn't have to. And if they won't accept a shar, which they wouldn't in my case, then why is it listed? That makes the "great" documentation incorrect. When I first made the attempt, things didn't go well.
I couldn't understand why command options were different from every other linux I had used and each had very impactful issues during installation, or during the move to a graphical user interface video wouldn't cooperate, partitioning was vastly different, etc. But, I persisted. In or , FreeBSD 6. It 'worked', well, sort of. It worked better than the last time, anyway. I figured things out and got it to serve my source code repos. A couple of years later and I remembered that my repo wasn't running linux and my uptime was six hundred someodd days.
Impressive to me, for sure. It was in that I decided to really figure things out and settle in with BSD. I wasn't going to be beat by something that claimed to be a variant of unix. It was then that I found the handbook - best documentation around, by far. I read it from cover to cover lulu gladly printed me a perfect bound edition of the pdf , twice. Heck, I refer to it anytime I can't figure something out, even today.
Anyway, for what it's worth, my experience is that FreeBSD is great. Is it great for newb BSD'ers? I'm not sure. Response time on questions is reasonable. FreeBSD is super stable, yet has pretty recent software packages if not cutting edge. It's not a perfect analogy, but it's mine. Go off-grid, fire up a terminal and start with a man man.
It ignites a storm of miracles.
0コメント